Cognitive (executive) load does not affect self-paced cycling exercise performance.
Objectives: to test the hypothesis that cognitive load (low vs. high load) during 20’ self-paced cycling exercise affect physical performance. Design: A pre-registered (https://osf.io/qept5/), randomized, within-subject design experiment. Methods: 28 trained and experienced male cyclists completed a 20’ time-trial cycling self-paced exercise in two separate session, corresponding to two working memory load conditions: 1-back or 2-back. We measured, power output, heart rate, RPE and mental fatigue. Results: Bayes analyses revealed extreme evidence for the 2-back task being more difficult than the 1-back task (BF10 = 4490). However, the observed data only showed anecdotal evidence for the alternative hypothesis for the power output (BF10= 1.52), but showed moderate evidence for the null hypothesis for the heart rate (BF10 = 0.172), anecdotal evidence for RPE (BF10 = 0.72) and anecdotal evidence for mental fatigue (BF10 = 0.588). Conclusions: Our data challenge the idea that self-paced exercise is regulated by top-down processing given that exercise was not impaired in the high working memory load condition task with respect to the low working memory load condition.
Authors

Are you an author of this paper? Check the Twitter handle we have for you is correct.

Darias Holgado (edit)
Mikel Zabala (edit)
Daniel Sanabria (edit)
Category

Sport and Exercise Science

Subcategories
Ask The Authors

Ask the authors of this paper a question or leave a comment.

Read it. Rate it.
#1. Which part of the paper did you read?

#2. The paper contains new data or analyses that is openly accessible?
#3. The conclusion is supported by the data and analyses?
#4. The conclusion is of scientific interest?
#5. The result is likely to lead to future research?

Github
User:
None (add)
Repo:
None (add)
Stargazers:
0
Forks:
0
Open Issues:
0
Network:
0
Subscribers:
0
Language:
None
Youtube
Link:
None (add)
Views:
0
Likes:
0
Dislikes:
0
Favorites:
0
Comments:
0
Other
Sample Sizes (N=):
Inserted:
Words Total:
Words Unique:
Source:
Abstract:
None
10/19/18 05:54PM
4,880
1,994
Tweets
Nobody has tweeted about this paper.
Images
Related