Evaluation of a 1-DOF Hand Exoskeleton for Neuromuscular Rehabilitation
A low-cost 1-DOF hand exoskeleton for neuromuscular rehabilitation has been designed and assembled. It consists of a base equipped with a servo motor, an index finger part, and a thumb part, connected through three gears. The index part has a tri-axial load cell and an attached ring to measure the finger force. An admittance control scheme was designed to provide intuitive control and positive force amplification to assist the user's finger movement. To evaluate the effects of different control parameters on neuromuscular re-sponse of the fingers, we created an integrated exoskeleton-hand musculo-skeletal model to virtually simulate and optimize the control loop. The exo-skeleton is controlled by a proportional derivative controller that computes the motor torque to follow a desired joint angle of the index part, which is obtained from inverse kinematics of a virtual end-effector mass driven by the finger force. We conducted parametric simulations of the exoskeleton in action, driven by the user's closing and opening finger motion, with different proportional gains, end-effector masses, and other coefficients. We com-pared the interaction forces between the index finger and the ring in both passive and active modes. The best performing assistive controller can re-duce the force from around 1.45N (in passive mode) to only around 0.52N, more than 64% of reduction. As a result, the muscle activations of the flex-ors and extensors were reduced significantly. We also noted the admittance control scheme is versatile and can also provide resistance (e.g. for strength training) by simply increasing the virtual end-effect mass.
NurtureToken New!

Token crowdsale for this paper ends in

Buy Nurture Tokens

Authors

Are you an author of this paper? Check the Twitter handle we have for you is correct.

Xinalian Zhou (add twitter)
Ashley Mont (edit)
Sergei Adamovich (add twitter)
Category

Computer Science - Robotics

Subcategory
Ask The Authors

Ask the authors of this paper a question or leave a comment.

Read it. Rate it.
#1. Which part of the paper did you read?

#2. The paper contains new data or analyses that is openly accessible?
#3. The conclusion is supported by the data and analyses?
#4. The conclusion is of scientific interest?
#5. The result is likely to lead to future research?

Github
User:
None (add)
Repo:
None (add)
Stargazers:
0
Forks:
0
Open Issues:
0
Network:
0
Subscribers:
0
Language:
None
Youtube
Link:
None (add)
Views:
0
Likes:
0
Dislikes:
0
Favorites:
0
Comments:
0
Other
Sample Sizes (N=):
Inserted:
Words Total:
Words Unique:
Source:
Abstract:
None
07/17/19 06:04PM
4,855
1,547
Tweets
Nobody has tweeted about this paper.
Images
Related