We define a moment-based estimator that maximizes the empirical saddlepoint
(ESP) approximation of the distribution of solutions to empirical moment
conditions. We call it the ESP estimator. We prove its existence, consistency
and asymptotic normality, and we propose novel test statistics. We also show
that the ESP estimator corresponds to the MM (method of moments) estimator
shrunk toward parameter values with lower estimated variance, so it reduces the
documented instability of existing moment-based estimators. In the case of
just-identified moment conditions, which is the case we focus on, the ESP
estimator is different from the MM estimator, unlike the recently proposed
alternatives, such as the empirical-likelihood-type estimators.

more |
pdf
| html
mathSTb:
Benjamin Holcblat, Fallaw Sowell : The Empirical Saddlepoint Estimator https://t.co/RgtDKh1W82 https://t.co/Bw8CLSzTJp

StatsPapers:
The Empirical Saddlepoint Estimator. https://t.co/6fJ9Xe83Gq

None.

None.

Sample Sizes : None.

Authors: 2

Total Words: 49457

Unqiue Words: 4343

This project works with the risk model developed by Li et al. (2015) and
quests modelling, estimating and pricing insurance for risks brought in by
innovative technologies, or other emerging or latent risks. The model considers
two different risk streams that arise together, however not clearly separated
or observed. Specifically, we consider a risk surplus process where premia are
adjusted according to past claim frequencies, like in a Bonus-Malus (BM)
system, when we consider a classical or historical risk stream and an
unforeseeable risk one. These are unknown risks which can be of high
uncertainty that, when pricing insurance (ratemaking and experience rating),
suggest a sensitive premium adjustment strategy. It is not clear for the
actuary to observe which claim comes from one or the other stream. When
modelling such risks it is crucial to estimate the behaviour of such claims,
occurrence and their severity. Premium calculation must fairly reflect the
nature of these two kinds of risk streams. We start proposing a...

more |
pdf
| html
None.

mathSTb:
Weihong Ni, Corina Constantinescu, Alfredo Egídio dos Reis, Véronique Maume-Deschamps (ICJ, PSPM) : Estimation of foreseeable and unforeseeable risks in motor insurance https://t.co/cnqzOsPEGa https://t.co/xMY8TFd9EN

StatsPapers:
Estimation of foreseeable and unforeseeable risks in motor insurance. https://t.co/l0o35H2arB

None.

None.

Sample Sizes : None.

Authors: 4

Total Words: 0

Unqiue Words: 0

We study the maximum likelihood estimation problem for several classes of
toric Fano models. We start by exploring the maximum likelihood degree for all
2-dimensional Gorenstein toric Fano varieties. We show that the ML degree is
equal to the degree of the surface in every case except for the quintic del
Pezzo surface with two singular points of type A1 and provide explicit
expressions that allow to compute the maximum likelihood estimate in closed
form whenever the ML degree is less than 5. We then explore the reasons for the
ML degree drop using A-discriminants and intersection theory. Finally, we show
that toric Fano varieties associated to 3-valent phylogenetic trees have ML
degree one and provide a formula for the maximum likelihood estimate. We prove
it as a corollary to a more general result about the multiplicativity of ML
degrees of codimension zero toric fiber products, and it also follows from a
connection to a recent result about staged trees.

more |
pdf
| html
None.

mathSTb:
Carlos Améndola, Dimitra Kosta, Kaie Kubjas : Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Toric Fano Varieties https://t.co/3mWbdSofV3 https://t.co/E4Q6SwmqKg

StatsPapers:
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Toric Fano Varieties. https://t.co/bc1qPRYK5u

None.

None.

Sample Sizes : None.

Authors: 3

Total Words: 0

Unqiue Words: 0

Assert is a website where the best academic papers on arXiv (computer science, math, physics), bioRxiv (biology), BITSS (reproducibility), EarthArXiv (earth science), engrXiv (engineering), LawArXiv (law), PsyArXiv (psychology), SocArXiv (social science), and SportRxiv (sport research) bubble to the top each day.

Papers are scored (in real-time) based on how verifiable they are (as determined by their Github repos) and how interesting they are (based on Twitter).

To see top papers, follow us on twitter @assertpub_ (arXiv), @assert_pub (bioRxiv), and @assertpub_dev (everything else).

To see beautiful figures extracted from papers, follow us on Instagram.

*Tracking 128,326 papers.*

Sort results based on if they are interesting or reproducible.

Interesting

Reproducible