### Top 6 Arxiv Papers Today in High Energy Physics - Experiment

##### #1. Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with overlapping photons and jets
###### CMS Collaboration
Results are reported from a search for new particles that decay into a photon and two gluons, in events with jets. Novel jet substructure techniques are developed that allow photons to be identified in an environment densely populated with hadrons. The analyzed proton-proton collision data were collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC, in 2016 at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The spectra of total transverse hadronic energy of candidate events are examined for deviations from the standard model predictions. No statistically significant excess is observed over the expected background. The first cross section limits on new physics processes resulting in such events are set. The results are interpreted as upper limits on the rate of gluino pair production, utilizing a simplified stealth supersymmetry model. The excluded gluino masses extend up to 1.7 TeV, for a neutralino mass of 200 GeV and exceed previous mass constraints set by analyses targeting events with isolated photons.
more | pdf | html
###### Tweets
scimichael: Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with overlapping photons and jets https://t.co/uORIFDr8UU
HEPExperPapers: Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with overlapping photons and jets. https://t.co/GASBs8niMx
None.
None.
###### Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 1
Total Words: 12503
Unqiue Words: 4944

##### #2. Study of the B$^+ \to$J$/ψ\overlineΛ$p decay in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV
###### CMS Collaboration
A study of the B$^+\to$J$/\psi\overline{\Lambda}$p decay using proton-proton collision data collected at $\sqrt{s}=$ 8 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.6 fb$^{-1}$, is presented. The ratio of branching fractions $\mathcal{B}$(B$^+ \to$J$/\psi\overline{\Lambda}$p )$/\mathcal{B}$(B$^\to$J$/\psi$K$^*$(892)$^+$) is measured to be (1.054 $\pm$ 0.057 (stat) $\pm$ 0.035 (syst) $\pm$ 0.011 ($\mathcal{B}$))%, where the last uncertainty reflects the uncertainties in the world-average branching fractions of $\overline{\Lambda}$ and K$^*$(892)$^+$ decays to reconstructed final states. The invariant mass distributions of the J$/\psi\overline{\Lambda}$, J$/\psi$p, and $\overline{\Lambda}$p systems produced in the B$^+\to$J$/\psi\overline{\Lambda}$p decay are investigated and found to be inconsistent with the pure phase space hypothesis. The analysis is extended by using a model-independent angular amplitude analysis, which shows that the inclusion of contributions from excited kaons...
more | pdf | html
None.
arxiv_org: Study of the B$^+ \to$J$/\psi\overline{\Lambda}$p decay in proton-proton collisions at $... https://t.co/C7RS31Diij https://t.co/hCKFoHIWAg CMSpapers: #CMSpaper: Study of the B^+ → J/ψΛ̅p decay in proton-proton collisions at √(s) = 8 TeV (arXiv:1907.05461) https://t.co/2XwLqLHOmB #BPhysics https://t.co/cVKgNSUQEB PKoppenburg: Interesting @CMSExperiment paper https://t.co/GoOZZV80Vn on B⁺→ J/ψΛ̅p. With the Λ̅ recoiling against the J/ψp system, they can't reach the #pentaquark region. Compare the mass plots of CMS and @LHCbExperiment for Λb⁰→ J/ψK⁻p. https://t.co/GZtOZRig5y ###### Github None. ###### Youtube None. ###### Other stats Sample Sizes : None. Authors: 1 Total Words: 0 Unqiue Words: 0 ###### 2.016 Mikeys ##### #3. Cross section measurements of$e^{+}e^{-} \to K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}K^{-} $and$ φK^{+}K^{-}$at center-of-mass energies from 2.10 to 3.08 GeV ###### BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, S. Ahmed, M. Albrecht, M. Alekseev, A. Amoroso, F. F. An, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, R. Baldini Ferroli, I. Balossino Balossino, Y. Ban, K. Begzsuren, J. V. Bennett, N. Berger, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, J Biernat, J. Bloms, I. Boyko, R. A. Briere, H. Cai, X. Cai, A. Calcaterra, G. F. Cao, N. Cao, S. A. Cetin, J. Chai, J. F. Chang, W. L. Chang, G. Chelkov, D. Y. Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, J. C. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, Y. B. Chen, W. Cheng, G. Cibinetto, F. Cossio, X. F. Cui, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dai, X. C. Dai, A. Dbeyssi, D. Dedovich, Z. Y. Deng, A. Denig, I. Denysenko, M. Destefanis, F. De Mori, Y. Ding, C. Dong, J. Dong, L. Y. Dong, M. Y. Dong, Z. L. Dou, S. X. Du, J. Z. Fan, J. Fang, S. S. Fang, Y. Fang, R. Farinelli, L. Fava, F. Feldbauer, G. Felici, C. Q. Feng, M. Fritsch, C. D. Fu, Y. Fu, Q. Gao, X. L. Gao, Y. Gao, Y. Gao, Y. G. Gao, Z. Gao, B. Garillon, I. Garzia, E. M. Gersabeck, A. Gilman, K. Goetzen, L. Gong, W. X. Gong, W. Gradl, M. Greco, L. M. Gu, M. H. Gu, S. Gu, Y. T. Gu, A. Q. Guo, L. B. Guo, R. P. Guo, Y. P. Guo, A. Guskov, S. Han, X. Q. Hao, F. A. Harris, K. L. He, F. H. Heinsius, T. Held, Y. K. Heng, M. Himmelreich, Y. R. Hou, Z. L. Hou, H. M. Hu, J. F. Hu, T. Hu, Y. Hu, G. S. Huang, J. S. Huang, X. T. Huang, X. Z. Huang, N. Huesken, T. Hussain, W. Ikegami Andersson, W. Imoehl, M. Irshad, Q. Ji, Q. P. Ji, X. B. Ji, X. L. Ji, H. L. Jiang, X. S. Jiang, X. Y. Jiang, J. B. Jiao, Z. Jiao, D. P. Jin, S. Jin, Y. Jin, T. Johansson, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, X. S. Kang, R. Kappert, M. Kavatsyuk, B. C. Ke, I. K. Keshk, A. Khoukaz, P. Kiese, R. Kiuchi, R. Kliemt, L. Koch, O. B. Kolcu, B. Kopf, M. Kuemmel, M. Kuessner, A. Kupsc, M. Kurth, M. G. Kurth, W. Kühn, J. S. Lange, P. Larin, L. Lavezzi, H. Leithoff, T. Lenz, C. Li, Cheng Li, D. M. Li, F. Li, F. Y. Li, G. Li, H. B. Li, H. J. Li, J. C. Li, J. W. Li, Ke Li, L. K. Li, Lei Li, P. L. Li, P. R. Li, Q. Y. Li, W. D. Li, W. G. Li, X. H. Li, X. L. Li, X. N. Li, Z. B. Li, Z. Y. Li, H. Liang, H. Liang, Y. F. Liang, Y. T. Liang, G. R. Liao, L. Z. Liao, J. Libby, C. X. Lin, D. X. Lin, Y. J. Lin, B. Liu, B. J. Liu, C. X. Liu, D. Liu, D. Y. Liu, F. H. Liu, Fang Liu, Feng Liu, H. B. Liu, H. M. Liu, Huanhuan Liu, Huihui Liu, J. B. Liu, J. Y. Liu, K. Y. Liu, Ke Liu, L. Y. Liu, Q. Liu, S. B. Liu, T. Liu, X. Liu, X. Y. Liu, Y. B. Liu, Z. A. Liu, Zhiqing Liu, Y. F. Long, X. C. Lou, H. J. Lu, J. D. Lu, J. G. Lu, Y. Lu, Y. P. Lu, C. L. Luo, M. X. Luo, P. W. Luo, T. Luo, X. L. Luo, S. Lusso, X. R. Lyu, F. C. Ma, H. L. Ma, L. L. Ma, M. M. Ma, Q. M. Ma, X. N. Ma, X. X. Ma, X. Y. Ma, Y. M. Ma, F. E. Maas, M. Maggiora, S. Maldaner, S. Malde, Q. A. Malik, A. Mangoni, Y. J. Mao, Z. P. Mao, S. Marcello, Z. X. Meng, J. G. Messchendorp, G. Mezzadri, J. Min, T. J. Min, R. E. Mitchell, X. H. Mo, Y. J. Mo, C. Morales Morales, N. Yu. Muchnoi, H. Muramatsu, A. Mustafa, S. Nakhoul, Y. Nefedov, F. Nerling, I. B. Nikolaev, Z. Ning, S. Nisar, S. L. Niu, S. L. Olsen, Q. Ouyang, S. Pacetti, Y. Pan, M. Papenbrock, P. Patteri, M. Pelizaeus, H. P. Peng, K. Peters, J. Pettersson, J. L. Ping, R. G. Ping, A. Pitka, R. Poling, V. Prasad, M. Qi, T. Y. Qi, S. Qian, C. F. Qiao, N. Qin, X. P. Qin, X. S. Qin, Z. H. Qin, J. F. Qiu, S. Q. Qu, K. H. Rashid, C. F. Redmer, M. Richter, A. Rivetti, V. Rodin, M. Rolo, G. Rong, Ch. Rosner, M. Rump, A. Sarantsev, M. Savrié, K. Schoenning, W. Shan, X. Y. Shan, M. Shao, C. P. Shen, P. X. Shen, X. Y. Shen, H. Y. Sheng, X. Shi, X. D Shi, J. J. Song, Q. Q. Song, X. Y. Song, S. Sosio, C. Sowa, S. Spataro, F. F. Sui, G. X. Sun, J. F. Sun, L. Sun, S. S. Sun, X. H. Sun, Y. J. Sun, Y. K Sun, Y. Z. Sun, Z. J. Sun, Z. T. Sun, Y. T Tan, C. J. Tang, G. Y. Tang, X. Tang, V. Thoren, B. Tsednee, I. Uman, B. Wang, B. L. Wang, C. W. Wang, D. Y. Wang, H. H. Wang, K. Wang, L. L. Wang, L. S. Wang, M. Wang, M. Z. Wang, Meng Wang, P. L. Wang, R. M. Wang, W. P. Wang, Z. H. Wang, X. Wang, X. F. Wang, X. L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. F. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. G. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, Zongyuan Wang, T. Weber, D. H. Wei, P. Weidenkaff, H. W. Wen, S. P. Wen, U. Wiedner, G. Wilkinson, M. Wolke, L. H. Wu, L. J. Wu, Z. Wu, L. Xia, Y. Xia, S. Y. Xiao, Y. J. Xiao, Z. J. Xiao, Y. G. Xie, Y. H. Xie, T. Y. Xing, X. A. Xiong, Q. L. Xiu, G. F. Xu, J. J. Xu, L. Xu, Q. J. Xu, W. Xu, X. P. Xu, F. Yan, L. Yan, W. B. Yan, W. C. Yan, Y. H. Yan, H. J. Yang, H. X. Yang, L. Yang, R. X. Yang, S. L. Yang, Y. H. Yang, Y. X. Yang, Yifan Yang, Z. Q. Yang, M. Ye, M. H. Ye, J. H. Yin, Z. Y. You, B. X. Yu, C. X. Yu, J. S. Yu, C. Z. Yuan, X. Q. Yuan, Y. Yuan, A. Yuncu, A. A. Zafar, Y. Zeng, B. X. Zhang, B. Y. Zhang, C. C. Zhang, D. H. Zhang, H. H. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, J. Q. Zhang, J. W. Zhang, J. Y. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, K. Zhang, L. Zhang, S. F. Zhang, T. J. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. H. Zhang, Y. T. Zhang, Yang Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yu Zhang, Z. H. Zhang, Z. P. Zhang, Z. Y. Zhang, G. Zhao, J. W. Zhao, J. Y. Zhao, J. Z. Zhao, Lei Zhao, Ling Zhao, M. G. Zhao, Q. Zhao, S. J. Zhao, T. C. Zhao, Y. B. Zhao, Z. G. Zhao, A. Zhemchugov, B. Zheng, J. P. Zheng, Y. Zheng, Y. H. Zheng, B. Zhong, L. Zhou, L. P. Zhou, Q. Zhou, X. Zhou, X. K. Zhou, X. R. Zhou, Xiaoyu Zhou, Xu Zhou, A. N. Zhu, J. Zhu, J. Zhu, K. Zhu, K. J. Zhu, S. H. Zhu, W. J. Zhu, X. L. Zhu, Y. C. Zhu, Y. S. Zhu, Z. A. Zhu, J. Zhuang, B. S. Zou, J. H. Zou We measure the Born cross sections of the process$e^{+}e^{-} \to K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}K^{-}$at center-of-mass (c.m.) energies,$\sqrt{s}$, between 2.100 and 3.080 GeV. The data were collected using the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider. An enhancement at$\sqrt{s}= 2.232$GeV is observed, very close to the$e^{+}e^{-} \to \Lambda \overline{\Lambda}$production threshold. A similar enhancement at the same c.m. energy is observed in the$e^{+}e^{-} \to \phi K^{+}K^{-}$cross section. The energy dependence of the$K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}K^{-}$and$\phi K^{+}K^{-}$cross sections differs significantly from that of$e^{+}e^{-} \to \phi \pi^{+}\pi^{-}$. more | pdf | html ###### Figures None. ###### Tweets HEPExperPapers: Cross section measurements of$e^{+}e^{-} \to K^{+}K^{-}K^{+}K^{-} $and$ \phi K^{+}K^{-}$at center-of-mass energies from 2.10 to 3.08 GeV. https://t.co/QEi5dWVigY ###### Github None. ###### Youtube None. ###### Other stats Sample Sizes : None. Authors: 484 Total Words: 0 Unqiue Words: 0 ###### 2.006 Mikeys ##### #4. Anti-electron Neutrino Event Selection from Backgrounds Based on Machine Learning ###### Chang Dong Shin, Kyung Kwang Joo, Dong Ho Moon, June Ho Choi, Myoung Youl Pac, Junghwan Goh For reactor neutrino experiments including the next--generation experiments will be adopting the liquid scintillator technique, criteria and time to select neutrino--induced inverse beta decay events from the background events need to be established. For higher performance efficiency, we investigated the results of applying a machine learning technique embedded in a standard ROOT package to select IBD signals. To obtain a higher statistics, the signals and background events in a gadolinium-loaded liquid scintillation detector were reproduced by Monte Carlo simulation. We report the efficiencies of neutrino--induced$n-H$and$n-Gd$events selection using the machine learning technique. more | pdf | html ###### Figures ###### Tweets scimichael: Anti-electron Neutrino Event Selection from Backgrounds Based on Machine Learning https://t.co/w1yjqM47I1 HEPExperPapers: Anti-electron Neutrino Event Selection from Backgrounds Based on Machine Learning. https://t.co/fKFWb5OE3J ###### Github None. ###### Youtube None. ###### Other stats Sample Sizes : None. Authors: 6 Total Words: 2147 Unqiue Words: 845 ###### 2.004 Mikeys ##### #5. Searches for lepton-flavour-violating decays of the Higgs boson in$\sqrt{s}=13$TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector ###### ATLAS Collaboration This Letter presents direct searches for lepton flavour violation in Higgs boson decays,$H\rightarrow e\tau$and$H\rightarrow\mu\tau$, performed with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The searches are based on a data sample of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy$\sqrt{s} = 13$TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess is observed above the expected background from Standard Model processes. The observed (median expected) 95% confidence-level upper limits are 0.47% (0.34$^{+0.13}_{-0.10}$%) and 0.28% (0.37$^{+0.14}_{-0.10}$%) for$H\rightarrow e\tau$and$H\rightarrow\mu\tau$, respectively. more | pdf | html ###### Figures None. ###### Tweets HEPExperPapers: Searches for lepton-flavour-violating decays of the Higgs boson in$\sqrt{s}=13$TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector. https://t.co/O14T3xPAxk ###### Github None. ###### Youtube None. ###### Other stats Sample Sizes : None. Authors: 1 Total Words: 0 Unqiue Words: 0 ###### 2.004 Mikeys ##### #6. Higgs couplings in ATLAS at Run2 ###### Heather Gray Since the discovery of the Higgs boson in summer 2012, the understanding of its properties has been a high priority of the ATLAS physics program. Measurements of Higgs boson properties sensitive to its production processes, decay modes, kinematics, mass, and spin/CP properties based on$pp\$ collision data recorded at 13 TeV are presented. The analyses of several production processes and decay channels will be described, including recent highlights as the direct observation of the couplings to top and beauty quarks, and an updated combination of all measurements.
more | pdf | html
None.
###### Tweets
HEPExperPapers: Higgs couplings in ATLAS at Run2. https://t.co/D28BZAM4sh
None.
None.
###### Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 1
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

Assert is a website where the best academic papers on arXiv (computer science, math, physics), bioRxiv (biology), BITSS (reproducibility), EarthArXiv (earth science), engrXiv (engineering), LawArXiv (law), PsyArXiv (psychology), SocArXiv (social science), and SportRxiv (sport research) bubble to the top each day.

Papers are scored (in real-time) based on how verifiable they are (as determined by their Github repos) and how interesting they are (based on Twitter).

To see top papers, follow us on twitter @assertpub_ (arXiv), @assert_pub (bioRxiv), and @assertpub_dev (everything else).

To see beautiful figures extracted from papers, follow us on Instagram.

Tracking 158,347 papers.

###### Search
Sort results based on if they are interesting or reproducible.
Interesting
Reproducible
Online
###### Stats
Tracking 158,347 papers.