Top 4 Arxiv Papers Today
in Signal Processing
Last year, IEEE 802.11 Extremely High Throughput Study Group (EHT Study
Group) was established to initiate discussions on new IEEE 802.11 features.
Coordinated control methods of the access points (APs) in the wireless local
area networks (WLANs) are discussed in EHT Study Group. The present study
proposes a deep reinforcement learning-based channel allocation scheme using
graph convolutional networks (GCNs). As a deep reinforcement learning method,
we use a well-known method double deep Q-network. In densely deployed WLANs,
the number of the available topologies of APs is extremely high, and thus we
extract the features of the topological structures based on GCNs. We apply GCNs
to a contention graph where APs within their carrier sensing ranges are
connected to extract the features of carrier sensing relationships.
Additionally, to improve the learning speed especially in an early stage of
learning, we employ a game theory-based method to collect the training data
independently of the neural network model. The simulation results...
Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Channel Allocation for Wireless LANs with Graph Convolutional Networks. Kota Nakashima, Shotaro Kamiya, Kazuki Ohtsu, Koji Yamamoto, Takayuki Nishio, and Masahiro Morikura https://t.co/STCMJsTHdQ
Total Words: 4325
Unqiue Words: 1341
This paper presents the first voltage-controlled MEMS oscillator (VCMO) based
on a Lithium Niobate (LiNbO3) lateral overtone bulk acoustic resonator (LOBAR).
The VCMO consists of a LOBAR in a closed loop with 2 amplification stages and a
varactor-embedded tunable LC tank. By adjusting the bias voltage applied to the
varactor, the tank can be tuned to change the closed-loop gain and phase
responses of the oscillator so that Barkhausen conditions are satisfied for a
particular resonance mode. The tank is designed to allow the proposed VCMO to
lock to any of the ten overtones ranging from 300 to 500 MHz. Owing to the
high-quality factors of the LiNbO3 LOBAR, the measured VCMO shows a low
close-in phase noise of -100 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz offset from a 300 MHz carrier and
a noise floor of -153 dBc/Hz while consuming 9 mW. With further optimization,
this VCMO can lead to direct radio frequency (RF) synthesis for ultra-low-power
transceivers in multi-mode Internet-of-Things (IoT) nodes.
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0
Millimeter-wave (mmWave) communications and cell densification are the key
techniques for the future evolution of cellular systems beyond 5G. Although the
current mmWave radio designs are focused on hybrid digital and analog receiver
array architectures, the fully digital architecture is an appealing option due
to its flexibility and support for multi-user multiple-input multiple-output
(MIMO). In order to achieve reasonable power consumption and hardware cost, the
specifications of analog circuits are expected to be compromised, including the
resolution of analog-to-digital converter (ADC) and the linearity of
radio-frequency (RF) front end. Although the state-of-the-art studies focus on
the ADC, the nonlinearity can also lead to severe system performance
degradation when strong input signals introduce inter-modulation distortion
(IMD). The impact of RF nonlinearity becomes more severe with densely deployed
mmWave cells since signal sources closer to the receiver array are more likely
to occur. In this work, we design and analyze...
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0
We consider an adversarial Bayesian signal processing problem involving "us"
and an "adversary". The adversary observes our state in noise; updates its
posterior distribution of the state and then chooses an action based on this
posterior. Given knowledge of "our" state and sequence of adversary's actions
observed in noise, we consider three problems: (i) How can the adversary's
posterior distribution be estimated? Estimating the posterior is an inverse
filtering problem involving a random measure - we formulate and solve several
versions of this problem in a Bayesian setting. (ii) How can the adversary's
observation likelihood be estimated? This tells us how accurate the adversary's
sensors are. We compute the maximum likelihood estimator for the adversary's
observation likelihood given our measurements of the adversary's actions where
the adversary's actions are in response to estimating our state. (iii) How can
the state be chosen by us to minimize the covariance of the estimate of the
adversary's observation likelihood? "Our"...
Total Words: 10186
Unqiue Words: 2453