Top 10 Arxiv Papers Today in Cosmology And Nongalactic Astrophysics


2.049 Mikeys
#1. H0LiCOW XII. Lens mass model of WFI2033-4723 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance and $H_0$
Cristian E. Rusu, Kenneth C. Wong, Vivien Bonvin, Dominique Sluse, Sherry H. Suyu, Christopher D. Fassnacht, James H. H. Chan, Stefan Hilbert, Matthew W. Auger, Alessandro Sonnenfeld, Simon Birrer, Frederic Courbin, Tommaso Treu, Geoff C. -F. Chen, Aleksi Halkola, Leon V. E. Koopmans, Philip J. Marshall, Anowar J. Shajib
We present the lens mass model of the quadruply-imaged gravitationally lensed quasar WFI2033-4723, and perform a blind cosmographical analysis based on this system. Our analysis combines (1) time-delay measurements from 14 years of data obtained by the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses (COSMOGRAIL) collaboration, (2) high-resolution $\textit{Hubble Space Telescope}$ imaging, (3) a measurement of the velocity dispersion of the lens galaxy based on ESO-MUSE data, and (4) multi-band, wide-field imaging and spectroscopy characterizing the lens environment. We account for all known sources of systematics, including the influence of nearby perturbers and complex line-of-sight structure, as well as the parametrization of the light and mass profiles of the lensing galaxy. After unblinding, we determine the effective time-delay distance to be $4784_{-248}^{+399}~\mathrm{Mpc}$, an average precision of $6.6\%$. This translates to a Hubble constant $H_{0} = 71.6_{-4.9}^{+3.8}~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$, assuming a flat...
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
DrEOChapman: And the Award for Best Acronym on Arxiv goes to.... H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL’s Wellspring or...H0LiCOW! Extra points for including an acronym IN YOUR ACRONYM. https://t.co/zvvgwMW0pu https://t.co/OMteWJzyBw
DScol: Pretty stoked about two new Strong Lens papers out tonight. One paper by H0LICOW https://t.co/nOsHIX9EHg, who do an amazing job blinding their analysis, and released H0 for new lens of H0=71.6+3.8−4.9 (pretty in middle). Second paper...
GCFChen: Our new blind H0 analysis from another strong lensing system just came out today! https://t.co/UkNrZSXscf. For this new system, we obtain H0=71.6+3.8-4.9!
AdrienCoffinet: RT @DScol: Pretty stoked about two new Strong Lens papers out tonight. One paper by H0LICOW https://t.co/nOsHIX9EHg, who do an amazing job…
sean_couch: RT @DScol: Pretty stoked about two new Strong Lens papers out tonight. One paper by H0LICOW https://t.co/nOsHIX9EHg, who do an amazing job…
cosmic_mar: RT @DScol: Pretty stoked about two new Strong Lens papers out tonight. One paper by H0LICOW https://t.co/nOsHIX9EHg, who do an amazing job…
plazasmalagon1: RT @DScol: Pretty stoked about two new Strong Lens papers out tonight. One paper by H0LICOW https://t.co/nOsHIX9EHg, who do an amazing job…
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 18
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

2.032 Mikeys
#2. Model-independent determination of $H_0$ and $Ω_{K0}$ from strong lensing and type Ia supernovae
Thomas Collett, Francesco Montanari, Syksy Rasanen
We present the first determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from strong lensing time delay data and type Ia supernova luminosity distances that is independent of the cosmological model. We also determine the spatial curvature model-independently. We assume that light propagation over long distances is described by the FLRW metric and geometrical optics holds, but make no assumption about the contents of the Universe or the theory of gravity on cosmological scales. We find $H_0=75.7^{+4.5}_{-4.4}$ km/s/Mpc and $\Omega_{K0}=0.12^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$. This is a 6\% determination of $H_0$. A weak prior from the cosmic microwave background on the distance to the last scattering surface improves this to $H_0=76.8^{+4.2}_{-3.8}$ km/s/Mpc and $\Omega_{K0}=0.18^{+0.25}_{-0.18}$. Assuming zero spatial curvature, we get $H_0=74.2^{+3.0}_{-2.9}$ km/s/Mpc, a precision of $4\%$. The measurements also provide a consistency test of the FLRW metric: we find no evidence against it.
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
SyksyRasanen: I wanted to do use strong gravitational lensing time delay data for some years now, in this paper we finally did it. A small contribution to the debate over the discrepancy in the Hubble constant, which measures how fast the universe is expanding. https://t.co/3ZaQqnmDUJ
RelativityPaper: Model-independent determination of $H_0$ and $\Omega_{K0}$ from strong lensing and type Ia supernovae. https://t.co/hlqLyhVJwy
DScol: By Collett et al. https://t.co/dO4GnvhXxw - combine Pantheon Supernova set with SL dataset, and get H0=74.2+3.0−2.9 assuming no curvature. What's particularly cool to me is same supernova set can be used with cepheids (H0 high), here SL (H0 high), BAO (H0 low).
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 3
Total Words: 5443
Unqiue Words: 1936

2.026 Mikeys
#3. Modified Gravity and Dark Energy models Beyond $w(z)$CDM Testable by LSST
Mustapha Ishak, Tessa Baker, Philip Bull, Eske M. Pedersen, Jonathan Blazek, Pedro G. Ferreira, C. Danielle Leonard, Weikang Lin, Eric Linder, Kris Pardo, Georgios Valogiannis
One of the main science goals of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is to uncover the nature of cosmic acceleration. In the base analysis, possible deviations from the Lambda-Cold-Dark-Matter ($\Lambda$CDM) background evolution will be probed by fitting a $w(z)$CDM model, which allows for a redshift-dependent dark energy equation of state with $w(z)$, within general relativity (GR). A rich array of other phenomena can arise due to deviations from the standard $\Lambda$CDM+GR model though, including modifications to the growth rate of structure and lensing, and novel screening effects on non-linear scales. Concrete physical models are needed to provide consistent predictions for these (potentially small) effects, to give us the best chance of detecting them and separating them from astrophysical systematics. A complex plethora of possible models has been constructed over the past few decades, with none emerging as a particular favorite. This document prioritizes a subset of these models along with rationales for further...
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
scimichael: Modified Gravity and Dark Energy models Beyond w(z) CDM Testable by LSST "we provide here guidelines on which theories appear to have higher priority for collaboration efforts due to their perceived promise and greater instructional value." https://t.co/7od8wp269o
higgsinocat: Modified Gravity and Dark Energy models Beyond $w(z)$CDM Testable by LSST. (arXiv:1905.09687v1 [https://t.co/brMgLCNEEc]) relevance:33% https://t.co/JJWjVd8BaT #darkmatter @Tessa_M_Baker https://t.co/Yof22k8Lbt
RelativityPaper: Modified Gravity and Dark Energy models Beyond $w(z)$CDM Testable by LSST. https://t.co/e0feXplJBg
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 11
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

2.024 Mikeys
#4. Testing Modified Gravity with Wide Binaries in GAIA DR2
Charalambos Pittordis, Will Sutherland
Several recent studies have shown that very wide binary stars can potentially provide an interesting test for modified-gravity theories which attempt to emulate dark matter; these systems should be almost Newtonian according to standard dark-matter theories, while the predictions for MOND-like theories are distinctly different, if the various observational issues can be overcome. Here we explore an observational application of the test from the recent GAIA DR2 data release: we select a large sample of $\sim 24,000$ candidate wide binary stars with distance $< 200$ parsec and magnitudes $G < 16$ from GAIA DR2, and estimated component masses using a main-sequence mass-luminosity relation. We then compare the frequency distribution of pairwise relative projected velocity (relative to circular-orbit value) as a function of projected separation; these distributions show a clear peak at a value close to Newtonian expectations, along with a long `tail' which extends to much larger velocity ratios; the `tail' is considerably more numerous...
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
MariaBergemann: on astro-ph: Pittordis &amp; Sutherland study 24000 @ESAGaia DR2 wide binary candidates closer than 200 parsec. Find that the data are inconsistent with MOND-like theories without an external field effect https://t.co/wniOniVBiM
higgsinocat: Testing Modified Gravity with Wide Binaries in GAIA DR2. (arXiv:1905.09619v1 [https://t.co/brMgLCNEEc]) relevance:100% https://t.co/S8N7Dcg2Kh #darkmatter https://t.co/5kukjnqdbb
RelativityPaper: Testing Modified Gravity with Wide Binaries in GAIA DR2. https://t.co/s6HXKYRJHb
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 2
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

2.022 Mikeys
#5. An estimate of the dark matter density from galaxy clusters and supernovae data
R. F. L. Holanda, R. S. Gonçalves, J. E. Gonzales, J. S. Alcaniz
Model-independent estimates of cosmological quantities are a challenge for observational cosmology. In this paper, we discuss a model-independent way to obtain the present dark matter density parameter ($\Omega_{\rm{c,0}}$) by combining gas mass fraction measurements in galaxy clusters ($f_{gas}$), type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) observations and measurements of the cosmic baryon abundance from observations of absorption systems at high redshifts. Our estimate is $\Omega_{\rm{c,0}} = 0.241 \pm 0.012$ ($1\sigma$). By considering the latest local measurement of the Hubble constant, $H_0 = 74.03 \pm 1.42$ (1$\sigma$), we obtain $\Omega_{\rm{M,0}} = 0.282 \pm 0.012$ ($1\sigma$) for the total matter density parameter. We also investigate departures of the evolution of the dark matter density with respect to the usual $a^{-3}$ scaling, as usual in interacting models of dark matter and dark energy. As the current data cannot confirm or rule out such an interaction, we perform a forecast analysis to estimate the necessary improvements in...
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
higgsinocat: An estimate of the dark matter density from galaxy clusters and supernovae data. (arXiv:1905.09689v1 [https://t.co/brMgLCNEEc]) relevance:100% https://t.co/RMILTn6riG #darkmatter https://t.co/4caKQSQjuX
scimichael: An estimate of the dark matter density from galaxy clusters and supernovae data https://t.co/jCNPbGiWXv
RelativityPaper: An estimate of the dark matter density from galaxy clusters and supernovae data. https://t.co/cS6U1s0RCZ
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 4
Total Words: 4875
Unqiue Words: 1696

2.022 Mikeys
#6. Effects of dark matter pressure on the ellipticity of cosmic voids
Zeinab Rezaei
The dark matter in or around the cosmic voids affects their shapes. The thermodynamical properties of dark matter can alter the ellipticity of cosmic voids. Here, applying the dark matter equation of state from the pseudo-isothermal density profile of galaxies, we explore the shapes of cosmic voids with the non zero pressure dark matter in different cosmological models. For this purpose, the linear growth of density perturbation in the presence of dark matter pressure is calculated. In addition, the matter transfer function considering the dark matter pressure, as well as the linear matter power spectrum in the presence of the dark matter pressure are presented. Employing these results, the probability density distribution for the ellipticity of cosmic voids with the non zero pressure dark matter is calculated. Our calculations verify that the dark matter pressure leads to more spherical shapes for the cosmic voids.
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
higgsinocat: Effects of dark matter pressure on the ellipticity of cosmic voids. (arXiv:1905.09664v1 [https://t.co/brMgLCNEEc]) relevance:100% https://t.co/LFoEAPUTT1 #darkmatter https://t.co/hnr5qtzTrm
scimichael: Effects of dark matter pressure on the ellipticity of cosmic voids https://t.co/scTUKnDkEr
RelativityPaper: Effects of dark matter pressure on the ellipticity of cosmic voids. https://t.co/X77GssODV5
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 1
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

2.015 Mikeys
#7. Gaussbock: Fast parallel-iterative cosmological parameter estimation with Bayesian nonparametrics
Ben Moews, Joe Zuntz
We present and apply Gaussbock, a new embarrassingly parallel iterative algorithm for cosmological parameter estimation designed for an era of cheap parallel computing resources. Gaussbock uses Bayesian nonparametrics and truncated importance sampling to accurately draw samples from posterior distributions with an orders-of-magnitude speed-up in wall time over alternative methods. Contemporary problems in this area often suffer from both increased computational costs due to high-dimensional parameter spaces and consequent excessive time requirements, as well as the need for fine tuning of proposal distributions or sampling parameters. Gaussbock is designed specifically with these issues in mind. We explore and validate the performance and convergence of the algorithm on a fast approximation to the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) posterior, finding reasonable scaling behavior with the number of parameters. We then test on the full DES Y1 posterior using large-scale supercomputing facilities, and recover reasonable agreement...
more | pdf | html
Figures
None.
Tweets
joezuntz: Second paper with my student Ben Moews is on the arxiv! We explored a variational inference-based parameter estimation algorithm he named Gaussbock (apparently a pun in German!). Related to PMC but more automated, and robust to extreme weights. https://t.co/Rnw2hUTG8o
StatsPapers: Gaussbock: Fast parallel-iterative cosmological parameter estimation with Bayesian nonparametrics. https://t.co/NwyeGmkzTu
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 2
Total Words: 0
Unqiue Words: 0

2.009 Mikeys
#8. Reconstructing Probability Distributions with Gaussian Processes
Thomas McClintock, Eduardo Rozo
Modern cosmological analyses constrain physical parameters using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or similar sampling techniques. Oftentimes, these techniques are computationally expensive to run and require up to thousands of CPU hours to complete. Here we present a method for reconstructing the log-probability distributions of completed experiments from an existing MCMC chain (or any set of posterior samples). The reconstruction is performed using Gaussian process regression for interpolating the log-probability. This allows for easy resampling, importance sampling, marginalization, testing different samplers, investigating chain convergence, and other operations. As an example use-case, we reconstruct the posterior distribution of the most recent Planck 2018 analysis. We then resample the posterior, and generate a new MCMC chain with forty times as many points in only thirty minutes. Our likelihood reconstruction tool can be found online at https://github.com/tmcclintock/AReconstructionTool.
more | pdf | html
Figures
Tweets
Github

ART: A Reconstruction Tool. For reconstructing probability distributions using Gaussian processes.

Repository: AReconstructionTool
User: tmcclintock
Language: Jupyter Notebook
Stargazers: 1
Subscribers: 0
Forks: 0
Open Issues: 0
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 2
Total Words: 4717
Unqiue Words: 1503

2.009 Mikeys
#9. Removal of Galactic foregrounds for the Simons Observatory primordial gravitational wave search
Ben Thorne, Jo Dunkley, David Alonso, Maximilian H. Abitbol, Josquin Errard, J. Colin Hill, Brian Keating, Grant Teply, Edward J. Wollack
Upcoming observations from the Simons Observatory have been projected to constrain the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, at the level of $\sigma(r)=$0.003. Here we describe one of the forecasting algorithms for the Simons Observatory in more detail, based on cleaning CMB polarization maps using a parametric model. We present a new code to perform this end-to-end forecast, and explore the assumptions in greater detail. If spatial uniformity of the spectral energy distribution of synchrotron radiation and thermal dust emission is assumed over the region planned for observations, covering almost a fifth of the sky, a bias of order 1--3$\sigma$ in $r$ is projected for foreground models consistent with current data. We find that by masking the most contaminated regions of sky, or by adopting more parameters to describe the spatial variation in spectral index for synchrotron and dust, such a bias can be mitigated for the foreground models we consider. We also explore strategies for testing whether the cleaned CMB polarization maps contain...
more | pdf | html
Figures
Tweets
Github

PySM: Software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky

Repository: PySM_public
User: bthorne93
Language: Jupyter Notebook
Stargazers: 18
Subscribers: 7
Forks: 19
Open Issues: 11
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 9
Total Words: 8294
Unqiue Words: 2500

2.007 Mikeys
#10. GRAMSES: a new route to general relativistic $N$-body simulations in cosmology - I. Methodology and code description
Cristian Barrera-Hinojosa, Baojiu Li
We present GRAMSES, a new pipeline for nonlinear cosmological $N$-body simulations in General Relativity (GR). This code adopts the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) formalism of GR, with constant mean curvature and minimum distortion gauge fixings, which provides a fully nonlinear and background independent framework for relativistic cosmology. Employing the fully constrained formulation, the Einstein equation is reduced to a set of ten elliptical equations solved using multigrid relaxation on adaptive mesh refinements (AMR), and three hyperbolic equations for the evolution of dynamical degrees of freedom. The current version of GRAMSES neglects the evolution equations for the gravitational sector by using the conformal flatness approximation, which allows it to compute the two scalar and two vector degrees of freedom, while extensions to include these evolution equations are ongoing. In this paper we describe the methodology, implementation, code tests and first results for cosmological simulations in a $\Lambda$CDM universe, while...
more | pdf | html
Figures
Tweets
arxiv_org: GRAMSES: a new route to general relativistic $N$-body simulations in cosmology - I. Metho... https://t.co/DoQ3ktgQpr https://t.co/whvIvtrxi7
DarkerMatters: GRAMSES: a new route to general relativistic N-body simulations in cosmology - I. Methodology and code description by Cristian Barrera-Hinojosa and Baojiu Li https://t.co/OdQ6s2DNWh @ERC_Research @STFC_Matters @DiRAC_HPC @becasconicyt https://t.co/3MyJAWS0Ke
Github
None.
Youtube
None.
Other stats
Sample Sizes : None.
Authors: 2
Total Words: 16359
Unqiue Words: 3793

About

Assert is a website where the best academic papers on arXiv (computer science, math, physics), bioRxiv (biology), BITSS (reproducibility), EarthArXiv (earth science), engrXiv (engineering), LawArXiv (law), PsyArXiv (psychology), SocArXiv (social science), and SportRxiv (sport research) bubble to the top each day.

Papers are scored (in real-time) based on how verifiable they are (as determined by their Github repos) and how interesting they are (based on Twitter).

To see top papers, follow us on twitter @assertpub_ (arXiv), @assert_pub (bioRxiv), and @assertpub_dev (everything else).

To see beautiful figures extracted from papers, follow us on Instagram.

Tracking 131,277 papers.

Search
Sort results based on if they are interesting or reproducible.
Interesting
Reproducible
Categories
All
Astrophysics
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics of Galaxies
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Condensed Matter
Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
Materials Science
Other Condensed Matter
Quantum Gases
Soft Condensed Matter
Statistical Mechanics
Strongly Correlated Electrons
Superconductivity
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
Hardware Architecture
Computational Complexity
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Computational Geometry
Computation and Language
Cryptography and Security
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computers and Society
Databases
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
Digital Libraries
Discrete Mathematics
Data Structures and Algorithms
Emerging Technologies
Formal Languages and Automata Theory
General Literature
Graphics
Computer Science and Game Theory
Human-Computer Interaction
Information Retrieval
Information Theory
Machine Learning
Logic in Computer Science
Multiagent Systems
Multimedia
Mathematical Software
Numerical Analysis
Neural and Evolutionary Computing
Networking and Internet Architecture
Other Computer Science
Operating Systems
Performance
Programming Languages
Robotics
Symbolic Computation
Sound
Software Engineering
Social and Information Networks
Systems and Control
Economics
Econometrics
General Economics
Theoretical Economics
Electrical Engineering and Systems Science
Audio and Speech Processing
Image and Video Processing
Signal Processing
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Experiment
High Energy Physics - Lattice
High Energy Physics - Lattice
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Theory
High Energy Physics - Theory
Mathematics
Commutative Algebra
Algebraic Geometry
Analysis of PDEs
Algebraic Topology
Classical Analysis and ODEs
Combinatorics
Category Theory
Complex Variables
Differential Geometry
Dynamical Systems
Functional Analysis
General Mathematics
General Topology
Group Theory
Geometric Topology
History and Overview
Information Theory
K-Theory and Homology
Logic
Metric Geometry
Mathematical Physics
Numerical Analysis
Number Theory
Operator Algebras
Optimization and Control
Probability
Quantum Algebra
Rings and Algebras
Representation Theory
Symplectic Geometry
Spectral Theory
Statistics Theory
Mathematical Physics
Mathematical Physics
Nonlinear Sciences
Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems
Chaotic Dynamics
Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases
Pattern Formation and Solitons
Exactly Solvable and Integrable Systems
Nuclear Experiment
Nuclear Experiment
Nuclear Theory
Nuclear Theory
Physics
Accelerator Physics
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Applied Physics
Atomic and Molecular Clusters
Atomic Physics
Biological Physics
Chemical Physics
Classical Physics
Computational Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Physics Education
Fluid Dynamics
General Physics
Geophysics
History and Philosophy of Physics
Instrumentation and Detectors
Medical Physics
Optics
Plasma Physics
Popular Physics
Physics and Society
Space Physics
Quantitative Biology
Biomolecules
Cell Behavior
Genomics
Molecular Networks
Neurons and Cognition
Other Quantitative Biology
Populations and Evolution
Quantitative Methods
Subcellular Processes
Tissues and Organs
Quantitative Finance
Computational Finance
Economics
General Finance
Mathematical Finance
Portfolio Management
Pricing of Securities
Risk Management
Statistical Finance
Trading and Market Microstructure
Quantum Physics
Quantum Physics
Statistics
Applications
Computation
Methodology
Machine Learning
Other Statistics
Statistics Theory
Feedback
Online
Stats
Tracking 131,277 papers.